2026 Regular Session
HB3403
Environment and natural resources; creating the Oklahoma Biosolids Land Application Research Pilot Program Act; effective date.
Legislative progress
i
This summary includes only completed milestones supported by recorded actions. It does not predict the next step, and it preserves later committee reassignments, concurrence, conference, veto, and approval actions when they occur.
Partner positions
Dislikes
A 5 YEAR pilot study which would DELAY ANY PROGRESS ON A MORATORIUM, STRICTER REGULATIONS, RESEARCH FOR REMEDIATION and wants the Oklahoma taxpayers to fund it through yet ANOTHER REVOLVING FUND not subject to fiscal year limitations! Biosolids applied under the pilot program shall be EXEMPT from state permitting otherwise required under environmental or land application rules and coordinate with the DEQ and utilize biosolids supplied by Oklahoma municipal wastewater treatment facilities. (Changed to 3 year from 5)
No public reasoning provided.
No public reasoning provided.
HORRIBLE BILL!!! They already know this is a problem, OKC documents show PFAS contamination on biosolids land application sites. Research shows toxic MCCP's airborne from biosolids in Oklahoma for the first time in the Westerrn Hemishpere. The humanure interim study proved biosolids are NOT safe. Individuals near biosolids have increased risks of cancers and autoimmune disorders. The DEQ is documented as stating "we have to protect the beneficial use of biosolids". Why are we wasting tax payer dollars to "study" this, just kicking the can down the road, passing the buck, and making the taxpayers foot the bill, bill!! "Oklahoma Biosolids Land Application Research Pilot Program Act Revolving Fund". The fund shall be a continuing fund, not subject to fiscal year limitations, and shall consist of all monies received by the Department from appropriations, apportionments, donations, and federal grants received for the purpose of completing the Oklahoma Biosolids Land Application Research Pilot Program Act created pursuant to Section 2 of this act. All monies accruing to the credit of the fund are hereby appropriated and may be budgeted and expended by the Department for the purpose provided for in this section. Further, chemical abortions and their residuals are entering our wastewater treatment systems, and inevitably ending up in wastewater and biosolids. Current treatment processes do nothing to remove pharmaceuticals from biosolids. Please see letter from 25 Congressmen, including Brecheen and Lankford: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26186656-congressional-letter-to-epa-re-mifepristone/ "We commend this administration's dedication to protecting life and safeguarding public health. In light of these commitments, we write to express our concerns regarding mifepristone and its potential contaminant effects on our nation's waters. In 2023, medication abortions accounted for more than 60% of all clinician-provided abortions that took place within the U.S. health care system-totaling roughly 648,500 medication abortions.These numbers do not reflect the unrecorded number of at-home medication abortions that were performed without the oversight of a clinician. It is imperative that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) considers evaluating the potential contaminant effects of this drug as the agency develops the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule 6 (UCMR 6). Mifepristone is the first step in a two-step drug regimen designed to facilitate an abortion. The drug blocks progesterone, a hormone necessary to support pregnancy and development of the child in the womb.2 A second drug, misoprostol, is taken 24 to 48 hours later to induce uterine contractions and expel the child and other placental tissue" (These are expelled into the toilet and go to the wastewater treatment plant, and into biosolids "humanure."
Recorded floor votes
5 roll calls are available for this bill. This record includes procedural and intermediate action as well as substantive final votes.
February 9, 2026 · House
House: Appropriations and Budget Natural Resources Subcommittee: DO PASS
Passed
9 yea–2 nay
March 4, 2026 · House
House: Appropriations and Budget Committee: DO PASS AS AMENDED BY CS
Passed
24 yea–1 nay
March 11, 2026 · House
House: THIRD READING
Passed ⭐ Substantive final action
63 yea–27 nay · 9 absent
April 9, 2026 · Senate
Senate: Energy Committee: DO PASS AMENDED CS
Passed
8 yea–2 nay
April 22, 2026 · Senate
Senate: THIRD READING
Passed ⭐ Substantive final action
30 yea–16 nay · 2 absent
Committee referrals
April 9, 2026 · Senate
Appropriations
April 1, 2026 · Senate
Energy
February 3, 2026 · House
Appropriations and Budget Natural Resources Subcommittee
February 3, 2026 · House
Appropriations and Budget
Instrument history
i
This is the complete recorded action history in the current source package. Highlighted entries are marked as significant by the source. A roll-call link appears only when a vote-like action has one unambiguous same-day chamber vote.
-
Senate SCs named Stewart, Green, Kern, Gollihare, Woods, Boren
-
House HC's named: GCCA
-
Senate Conference granted; conferees to be named later
-
House SA's rejected, conference requested, conferees to be named later
-
House SA's received
-
Senate Engrossed to House
-
Senate Referred for engrossment
-
Senate Measure passed: Ayes: 30 Nays: 16 View roll call
-
Senate General Order, Considered
-
Senate Placed on General Order
-
Senate Withdrawn from Appropriations committee
-
Senate Referred to Appropriations
-
Senate Reported Do Pass, amended by committee substitute Energy committee; CR filed View roll call
-
Senate Coauthored by Senator Green
-
Senate Second Reading referred to Energy Committee then to Appropriations Committee
-
Senate First Reading
-
House Engrossed, signed, to Senate
-
House Referred for engrossment
-
House Third Reading, Measure passed: Ayes: 63 Nays: 27 View roll call
-
House Coauthored by Representative(s) Alonso-Sandoval
-
House General Order
-
House Authored by Senator Stewart (principal Senate author)
-
House CR; Do Pass, amended by committee substitute Appropriations and Budget Committee
-
House Recommendation to the full committee; Do Pass Appropriations and Budget Natural Resources Subcommittee View roll call
-
House Referred to Appropriations and Budget Natural Resources Subcommittee
-
House Second Reading referred to Appropriations and Budget
-
House Authored by Representative Patzkowsky
-
House First Reading