2026 Regular Session
HB3411
Environment and natural resources; requiring Department of Environmental Quality to purchase certain equipment; biosolids testing; prohibition on biosolids; rules; implementation by certain date; effective date.
Legislative progress
i
This summary includes only completed milestones supported by recorded actions. It does not predict the next step, and it preserves later committee reassignments, concurrence, conference, veto, and approval actions when they occur.
Partner positions
Likes
No public reasoning provided.
Unfortunately, since the better bills by Senator Jett and House Rep Shaw were killed.... this is the best option at this point to begin protecting homeowners with disclosures and testing on land.
1. It forbids them from using biosolids on food crops, so no more poopy PFAS carrots and corn and wheat… (Unfortunately they can still use it on hay, which is then taken up into the cows that end up as your steak.) 2. It makes them test for PFAS before land applying humanure. (Unfortunately it doesn’t make that info public, but, at least they’re testing now. 🙄) 3. It requires them to give warning of risks to the farmers taking free humanure. Kind of like a warning label on glyphosate and cigarettes. 👀 4. It limits land application in the same field to once every OTHER year. 5. It requires that the DEQ also approve methods like the microbes that eat humanure (saving cities millions and no need to land apply) and super critical water solutions (water hotter than molten lava that destroys PFAS and bacteria etc in humanure.) These two methods are things we specifically asked for, and I appreciate Representative John George including them in the bill for us.
No public reasoning provided.
This bill on humanure (biosolids) HB 3411 is being heard this morning. Below are the reasons we need to support HB 3411. 1. It forbids them from using biosolids on food crops, so no more poopy PFAS carrots and corn and wheat… (Unfortunately they can still use it on hay, which is then taken up into the cows that end up as your steak.) 2. It makes them test for PFAS before land applying humanure. (Unfortunately it doesn’t make that info public, but, at least they’re testing now. ) 3. It requires them to give warning of risks to the farmers taking free humanure. Kind of like a warning label on glyphosate and cigarettes. 4. It limits land application in the same field to once every OTHER year. 5. It requires that the DEQ also approve methods like the microbes that eat humanure (saving cities millions and no need to land apply) and super critical water solutions (water hotter than molten lava that destroys PFAS and bacteria etc in humanure.) These two methods are things we specifically asked for, and I appreciate Representative John George including them in the bill for us. Now, is this bill GREAT?? Nope. Not even close, but since they kìlled Senator Shane Jett and Representative Jim Shaw’s GREAT bills to ban humanure on farmland, this bill is the best we’ve got left this session. So, I’m asking for a yes vote today. (Because, some of us don’t retaliate against good legislation just because the senate author, Grant Green, voted in favor of a bill to destroy her donkey dairy less than 12 hours before…..) That would be wrong and vindictive, and would make me no better than them. It’s about what’s best for the people of Oklahoma. Please ask your OK State House Representative to vote YES on this bill today. Sincerely, The Donkey Milk Lady Save Oklahoma Farms and Ranches
Recorded floor votes
3 roll calls are available for this bill. This record includes procedural and intermediate action as well as substantive final votes.
March 3, 2026 · House
House: Rules Committee: DO PASS AS AMENDED BY CS
Passed
9 yea–1 nay
March 11, 2026 · House
House: THIRD READING
Passed ⭐ Substantive final action
89 yea–0 nay · 10 absent
April 9, 2026 · Senate
Senate: Energy Committee: DO PASS AMENDED
Passed
8 yea–2 nay
Committee referrals
Instrument history
i
This is the complete recorded action history in the current source package. Highlighted entries are marked as significant by the source. A roll-call link appears only when a vote-like action has one unambiguous same-day chamber vote.
-
Senate Referred to Appropriations
-
Senate Enacting clause stricken
-
Senate Reported Do Pass as amended Energy committee; CR filed View roll call
-
Senate Second Reading referred to Energy Committee then to Appropriations Committee
-
Senate First Reading
-
House Engrossed, signed, to Senate
-
House Referred for engrossment
-
House Third Reading, Measure passed: Ayes: 89 Nays: 0 View roll call
-
House Title stricken
-
House Amended by floor substitute
-
House General Order
-
House Authored by Senator Green (principal Senate author)
-
House Coauthored by Representative(s) Patzkowsky
-
House CR; Do Pass, amended by committee substitute Rules Committee
-
House Remove Representative Patzkowsky as principal House author and substitute with Representative George
-
House Second Reading referred to Rules
-
House Authored by Representative Patzkowsky
-
House First Reading