2026 Regular Session
SB1835
Eminent domain; establishing standards for proof of certain benefit; establishing requirements to calculate certain compensation; prohibiting certain waiver. Effective date.
Legislative progress
i
This summary includes only completed milestones supported by recorded actions. It does not predict the next step, and it preserves later committee reassignments, concurrence, conference, veto, and approval actions when they occur.
Partner positions
Likes
I support SB 1835 because it strengthens fairness for property owners when land is taken for public use and helps ensure people are not left worse off after losing their property. The bill’s intent is sound, but a few clarifications would help prevent confusion, uneven application, and future disputes—especially around how replacement property is evaluated, how benefits are claimed, and how negotiations are handled. These changes would improve clarity and consistency without changing the bill’s purpose. 1) Clarify “Same Community” for Replacement Property Example: If a landowner’s home is taken in a rural area with no similar properties available nearby, the replacement option should clearly allow use of the closest practical area with similar living conditions, rather than limiting choices to an artificially narrow boundary. Why: Without clarity, agencies and owners may disagree on what counts as the “same community,” leading to delays, disputes, or unequal treatment. 2) Require Clear Proof When Claiming Property Benefits Example: If an agency claims the remaining property benefits from a project, it should show concrete evidence—such as measurable access improvements or utility upgrades—rather than general statements about future economic growth. Why: This prevents vague or speculative claims from being used to reduce what a property owner receives. 3) Protect Fair Negotiation Before Formal Action Example: During negotiations, property owners should receive clear, written explanations of how compensation was calculated before being asked to agree to a settlement. Why: This promotes transparency and reduces pressure on owners to accept terms they don’t fully understand. Who these amendments protect: These amendments protect property owners by ensuring fair treatment, clear expectations, and honest calculations. They also protect taxpayers and public agencies by reducing disputes, litigation, and inconsistent outcomes—keeping the process fair, transparent, and focused on the bill’s original intent.
No public reasoning provided.
No public reasoning provided.
No public reasoning provided.
Committee referrals
February 3, 2026 · Senate
Judiciary
Instrument history
i
This is the complete recorded action history in the current source package. Highlighted entries are marked as significant by the source. A roll-call link appears only when a vote-like action has one unambiguous same-day chamber vote.
-
Senate Second Reading referred to Judiciary
-
Senate Authored by Senator Sacchieri
-
Senate First Reading