(2332 Senate floor votes analyzed β so far...)
Last Action: None
Date: 2026-02-03
Pending: π Business and Insurance π 2026-02-26 at 09:30
Author: Jonathan Wingard
1
Last Action: None
Date: 2026-02-09
Pending: π Agriculture and Wildlife π Not Scheduled
Author: Jonathan Wingard
Co-sponsors: David Hardin
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I support SB 2125 because it expands freedom for small farmers and consumers by allowing the direct sale and advertising of ungraded raw milk and raw milk products. To keep that intent intact while avoiding confusion or misuse, a few clarifications are needed around third-party sales, labeling consistency, the emergency clause, and the definition of βincidental salesβ. These changes strengthen the bill without changing its purpose.
1) Clear Limits on Third-Party Sales
Example: If raw milk is sold at a farmers market or through a third party, the consumer should be able to clearly identify the original farm that produced it, and the producer should remain responsible for how it is handled and represented.
Why: Without clear limits, third-party sales could blur responsibility and create enforcement confusion if something goes wrong.
2) Consistent, Plain-Language Labeling
Example: Every container sold should clearly state that the product is raw or unpasteurized, list the date it was filled, and plainly disclose that it is not inspected or regulated.
Why: Clear and consistent labels ensure consumers understand what they are buying and reduce the risk of disputes or claims of deception.
3) Narrow the Emergency Clause
Example: The bill could take effect on a standard timeline rather than immediately, unless a clear and specific public safety need is identified.
Why: Using emergency clauses when there is no immediate threat can set an unnecessary precedent and weaken public trust.
ο»Ώο»Ώ4) Clear Definition of βIncidental Salesβ
Example: Incidental sales should be clearly understood as small-scale sales connected to what a farm actually produces each month, not ongoing or high-volume distribution that looks like a commercial operation.
Why: Without a clear meaning, the exemption could be stretched beyond its intent and used as a loophole by large or industrial-style sellers.
Who These Amendments Protect
These amendments protect small farmers by reducing the risk of unfair enforcement, protect consumers by ensuring transparency and informed choice, and protect the state by preventing regulatory creep or confusion as the market grows. The result is a clearer, fairer system that honors the billβs intent while guarding against abuse.
This bill is THE BEST raw milk bill this session!
-Great: Allows all raw milk to be advertised
-Great: Allows raw milk to be transported off farm
-Great: Allows 1500 gallons of raw milk to be sold per month** (This bill increases raw milk sales from 100 gallons a month to 1500 gallons a month, however, there should be NO limits on sales of raw milk, this restricts farms from making a decent living and limits their ability to be competitive, and appears to be unconstitional favoring of certain industries over small business....see below.)
-Great: removes ALL raw milk producers from the egregious Oklahoma Milk Products Act!!!
(To be even better, get with Rep Hardin and amend to add language allowing off farm sale to restaurants, feed stores, and farmers markets.)
***HR 8374 "The Interstate Milk Freedom Act" proposed in Congress will allow the interstate sale of raw milk. When it is enacted, the state of Oklahoma will be putting raw milk farms at a disadvantage in the USA by limiting their sales of raw milk per month and prohitibing them from their constitutional right to freedom of speech (advertising their legal product) under current regulations of the Oklahoma Milk Products Act.
Last Action: None
Date: 2026-02-09
Pending: π Agriculture and Wildlife π Not Scheduled
Author: Jonathan Wingard
Co-sponsors: David Hardin
1
1
1
1
1
1
I support SB 2028 because it expands consumer choice and supports small farmers by allowing limited, direct sales of ungraded raw milk and related products. To strengthen the bill without changing its intent, a few clarifications are needed so producers clearly understand what is allowed, consumers receive consistent notice, and enforcement remains fair and predictable rather than discretionary.
1: Clear Consumer Notice Standard
Example:A producer selling ungraded raw milk posts a simple, visible notice at the point of sale and on containers stating that the product is not inspected or regulated.
Why:Without a clear, consistent notice standard, producers could face uneven enforcement based on subjective judgments about what βnotificationβ means.
2: Defined Scope of βIncidental Salesβ
Example:A small farm selling raw milk directly to families understands that βincidental salesβ means small-scale, supplemental sales tied to on-farm productionβnot a commercial retail operation.
Why:Clarifying this prevents confusion and stops future expansion of enforcement that could treat small farmers like large commercial dairies.
3: Limits on Transport Expectations
Example:When a farmer delivers raw milk directly to a consumer, expectations are limited to basic handling consistent with small-scale, direct sales, not commercial-grade transport requirements.
Why:Without clear limits, agencies could later impose costly standards that were never intended for direct, farm-to-consumer sales.
Who These Amendments ProtectThese amendments protect small farmers from arbitrary enforcement, consumers from inconsistent information, and regulators from pressure to stretch the law beyond its intent. Clear boundaries preserve the billβs purpose while preventing regulatory creep, confusion, and unequal treatment.
Last Action: None
Date: 2026-02-24
Author: Jonathan Wingard
Co-sponsors: Kevin West Jim Shaw Gabe Woolley Casey Murdock David Bullard George Burns Warren Hamilton Shane Jett Jack Stewart Dusty Deevers Randy Grellner Kendal Sacchieri Brian Guthrie Lisa Standridge Julie McIntosh
1
1
1
1
1
Limits government overreach for βemergenciesβ which has been used too frequently in recent years attempting to bypass our constitutional protections.
Last Action: None
Date: 2026-02-09
Pending: π Agriculture and Wildlife π Not Scheduled
Author: Jonathan Wingard
Co-sponsors: David Hardin
1
1
1
1
Last Action: None
Date: 2026-02-12
Author: Jonathan Wingard
Co-sponsors: Eric Roberts
2
1
Last Action: None
Date: 2026-02-03
Pending: π Judiciary π Not Scheduled
Author: Jonathan Wingard
1
1
Last Action: None
Date: 2026-02-03
Pending: π Judiciary π Not Scheduled
Author: Jonathan Wingard
1
1
SB 1452βs rebuttable presumption of joint custody structurally supports dual parental involvement and aligns with parental-rights priorities, constitutional norms of freedom plus judicial discretion, and conservative values of family integrity and clear legal standards β so long as courts exercise discretion responsibly in the best interests of the child
Last Action: None
Date: 2026-02-03
Pending: π Retirement and Government Resources π Not Scheduled
Author: Jonathan Wingard
1
1
Last Action: None
Date: 2026-02-03
Pending: π Economic Development, Workforce and Tourism π Not Scheduled
Author: Jonathan Wingard
1
1
Last Action: None
Date: 2026-02-03
Pending: π Judiciary π Not Scheduled
Author: Jonathan Wingard
1
Last Action: None
Date: 2026-02-03
Pending: π Agriculture and Wildlife π Not Scheduled
Author: Jonathan Wingard
1
1
Yes, we shouldn't have to get a permit to sneeze. Or raise captive bred alligators. ;)
Last Action: None
Date: 2026-02-03
Pending: π Economic Development, Workforce and Tourism π Not Scheduled
Author: Jonathan Wingard
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: None
Date: 2025-05-05
Author: Jonathan Wingard
Co-sponsors: Dell Kerbs
1
SB 544 addresses identity verification and fraud prevention within state licensing systems. The bill strengthens safeguards against fraudulent identification while maintaining limits on access to biometric data, including requirements for court orders and parental authorization for minors.
Last Action: None
Date: 2025-02-04
Pending: π Business and Insurance π Not Scheduled
Author: Jonathan Wingard
1
Last Action: None
Date: 2025-02-06
Pending: π Aeronautics and Transportation π Not Scheduled
Author: Jonathan Wingard
1
Last Action: None
Date: 2025-03-03
Author: Jonathan Wingard
Co-sponsors: Jim Shaw David Bullard Warren Hamilton
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: None
Date: 2025-03-04
Author: Jonathan Wingard
Co-sponsors: Scott Fetgatter
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: None
Date: 2025-05-22
Author: Jonathan Wingard
Co-sponsors: David Hardin
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: None
Date: 2025-02-04
Pending: π Business and Insurance π Not Scheduled
Author: Jonathan Wingard