π Next Meeting: 2026-04-16 8:45 AM
π§Ύ Bills Pending: 24
π View Agenda
π₯
Ally Seifried
(R)
π₯
Darcy Jech
(R)
Last Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications Committee then to Appropriations Committee
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π 2026-04-16 at 8:45 AM
Author: Anthony Moore
Co-sponsors: Ally Seifried Danny Williams Nick Archer
Last Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π 2026-04-16 at 8:45 AM
Author: Kyle Hilbert
Co-sponsors: Ally Seifried
2
1
1
This amendatory language extends the boards existence to December of 2030. There are multiple reports of misdirected funds and waste in this original legislation. This needs auditing.
Last Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications Committee then to Appropriations Committee
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π 2026-04-16 at 8:45 AM
Author: Nick Archer
Co-sponsors: Dave Rader Mark Lepak Meloyde Blancett Josh West Brian Hill Anthony Moore Eric Roberts Preston Stinson Clay Staires Mark Chapman
3
1
Would connect state agencies, higher education institutions, and private industry partners to align workforce development, site readiness, infrastructure planning, and federal engagement strategies. Archer said the goal is to ensure Oklahoma is prepared to compete when federal agencies such as the U.S. Department of Energy, NASA, or the U.S. Department of Defense consider new research facilities. Would identify and prepare potential sites, align workforce pipelines, and assemble infrastructure and INCENTIVE PACKAGES needed to attract federal investment.
ο»Ώο»Ώο»Ώο»Ώο»Ώ(NO MORE INCENTIVE PACKAGES FROM THE TAXPAYERS TO INDUSTRIES THAT SHOULD STAND ON THEIR OWN!)
Absolutely NOT!!
Last Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π 2026-04-16 at 8:45 AM
Author: Cody Maynard
Co-sponsors: Ally Seifried Jim Olsen Daniel Pae Marilyn Stark Steve Bashore Arturo Alonso-Sandoval Derrick Hildebrant
1
4
1
Protects minors from AI systems designed to simulate human-like relationships, prohibit the deployment of social AI companions and human-like AI chatbots to minors and would require reasonable age certification measures, with a narrow exception for certain therapeutic tools under strict professional oversight.
Yes, but the fines need to be more severe, and unlimited liability if the chatbot results in a suicide or other self harm.
Last Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π 2026-04-16 at 8:45 AM
Author: Cody Maynard
Co-sponsors: David Bullard Denise Hader Jim Olsen Daniel Pae Marilyn Stark Derrick Hildebrant Rob Hall Amanda Clinton
1
3
2
We agree with the intent of the bill to preclude AI systems from being granted personhood. However, we have some questions:
Affirms that AI systems and algorithms may not be granted legal personhood under the Constitution or laws of Oklahoma.
Last Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications Committee then to Appropriations Committee
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π 2026-04-16 at 8:45 AM
Author: Mark Lawson
Co-sponsors: Kristen Thompson
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π 2026-04-16 at 8:45 AM
Author: Anthony Moore
Co-sponsors: Ally Seifried Chad Caldwell Dick Lowe Nick Archer Rob Hall
3
Last Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications
Date: 2025-02-04
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π Not Scheduled
Author: Julie Daniels
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications
Date: 2025-02-04
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π Not Scheduled
Author: Ally Seifried
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications Committee then to Appropriations Committee
Date: 2025-02-04
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π Not Scheduled
Author: Dusty Deevers
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications
Date: 2025-02-04
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π Not Scheduled
Author: Ally Seifried
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications
Date: 2025-02-04
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π Not Scheduled
Author: Shane Jett
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Coauthored by Representative Moore (principal House author)
Date: 2025-03-03
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π Not Scheduled
Author: Kristen Thompson
Co-sponsors: Anthony Moore
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications Committee then to Appropriations Committee
Date: 2026-02-03
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π Not Scheduled
Author: Micheal Bergstrom
1
The OKGOP platform states we believe in sunset laws, zero based budgeting and performance audits to justify government programs.
Last Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications Committee then to Appropriations Committee
Date: 2026-02-03
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π Not Scheduled
Author: Ally Seifried
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications
Date: 2026-02-03
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π Not Scheduled
Author: Randy Grellner
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications
Date: 2026-02-03
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π Not Scheduled
Author: Mark Mann
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications
Date: 2026-02-03
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π Not Scheduled
Author: Warren Hamilton
Last Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications
Date: 2026-02-03
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π Not Scheduled
Author: Randy Grellner
1
Last Action: Coauthored by Representative Newton (principal House author)
Date: 2026-02-12
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π Not Scheduled
Author: Darcy Jech
Co-sponsors: Carl Newton
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Coauthored by Representative Newton (principal House author)
Date: 2026-02-12
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π Not Scheduled
Author: Darcy Jech
Co-sponsors: Carl Newton
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π Not Scheduled
Author: Michelle McCane
Co-sponsors: Micheal Bergstrom Jared Deck
2
Last Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π Not Scheduled
Author: Cody Maynard
Co-sponsors: Jerry Alvord Brian Hill Jim Olsen Daniel Pae Arturo Alonso-Sandoval Derrick Hildebrant Ronald Stewart Amanda Clinton
1
4
1
Among other restricted uses of AI by state agencies, this bill prohibits the use of AI for real-time and remote biometric identification systems used for surveillance in public spaces, such as facial recognition. However, such surveillance use of AI is allowed when such use is conducted pursuant to a valid warrant or court order or in circumstances involving a specific imminent threat to life or serious injury.
Regarding the surveillance exception pursuant to a valid warrant or court order we suggest the language be revised to require any warrant or court order be a probable cause warrant as required by the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution.
Creates guardrails for AI use in state government. It would restrict high-risk uses such as manipulation, unlawful discrimination through automated classification systems, real-time remote biometric surveillance in public spaces, and deceptive or malicious deepfakes. It also would require human review of certain AI-driven recommendations and would strengthen transparency by requiring agency reporting and an annual statewide AI report published by the Office of Management and Enterprise Services.
Good bill, wish it was even stronger!
Last Action: Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Technology and Telecommunications π Not Scheduled
Author: Jay Steagall
Co-sponsors: Jerry Alvord Scott Fetgatter
3
providing liability protections from civil lawsuits for counties and municipalities that adopt recognized cybersecurity frameworks.