Mass Resistance Oklahoma
Top Aligned Legislators
โน๏ธ How this works
All Bills Scored
SB1200: School elections; prohibiting persons engaged in certain activities from being eligible to be a candidate for school district or technology center school district board of education.
Last Action: Second Reading referred to Education
Date: 2026-02-03
Pending: ๐ Education ๐ Not Scheduled
Author: Kendal Sacchieri
1
1
1
1
1
SB1468: Firearms; modifying elements of certain offenses. Effective date.
Last Action: Second Reading referred to Public Safety
Date: 2026-02-03
Pending: ๐ Public Safety ๐ Not Scheduled
Author: Dave Rader
1
1
1
This legislation infringes on 2nd Amendment rights. "Restricted bullet", "Body Armor", and Modifications to Firearms. OKGOP platform is clear on protecting our 2nd Amendments. This is a bad bill.
NO!!!!! terrible bill adds following; 2. โRestricted bulletโ means a round or elongated missile with a core of less than sixty percent (60%) lead and having a fluorocarbon coating, which is designed to travel at a high velocity and is capable of penetrating body armor; and 3. โRestricted weaponโ means any firearm that is capable of shooting more than one round automatically, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger. The term includes devices that convert ordinary firearms or semiautomatic firearms into fully automatic firearms, and includes, but is not limited to, Glock switches or auto sears, but does not include bump stocks.
HB1164: Children; Protect Families from Government Overreach Act; purpose; Department of Human Services; custody; records; exception; emergency motion; imminent threat; report; Oklahoma Commission for Human Services; noncompliance; civil remedies; criminal penalties; agencies; audits; court; reassessment; codification; effective date.
Last Action: Referred to Criminal Judiciary
Date: 2025-02-04
Pending: ๐ Criminal Judiciary ๐ Not Scheduled
Author: Gabe Woolley
Co-sponsors: David Bullard David Smith Shane Jett Jim Olsen
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SB228: Covenant marriage; creating the Covenant Marriage Act of Oklahoma; establishing requirements for entering covenant marriage; providing tax credit for covenant marriage. Effective date. Emergency.
Last Action: Coauthored by Senator Jett
Date: 2025-02-19
Author: Dusty Deevers
Co-sponsors: Shane Jett
1
1
SCR8: Concurrent resolution; recognizing that marriage is between one man and one woman; calling on the Supreme Court of the United States to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges.
Last Action: Remove as coauthor Senator Reinhardt
Date: 2025-05-14
Author: Dusty Deevers
Co-sponsors: Jim Olsen Danny Williams Tom Gann Justin Humphrey Rick West David Hardin Neil Hays Chris Banning Derrick Hildebrant Molly Jenkins Gabe Woolley Jim Shaw Ryan Eaves Cody Maynard Max Wolfley Kevin West Micheal Bergstrom Roland Pederson Warren Hamilton Randy Grellner Christi Gillespie Dana Prieto Grant Green Ally Seifried Jack Stewart Jerry Alvord Tom Woods Shane Jett Julie McIntosh Lisa Standridge Avery Frix Brian Guthrie Kendal Sacchieri George Burns Dave Rader Casey Murdock David Bullard Chuck Hall Brenda Stanley Darrell Weaver
1
1
1
Just as the wrongful SCOTUS decision under Roe v. Wade was subsequently overturned, so should the SCOTUS decision of Obergefell v. Hodges. Biblical law should ALWAYS triumph man's laws under the U.S or State Constitutions. Oklahoma needs to be the example in this endeavor! Let's do what is right OKLAHOMA!
The OKGOP platform is clear on this matter. Marriage is between a man and a woman.
Just as SCOTUS overturned the 1973 initial decision of Roe v. Wade in 2022, I believe they would do the same, based on Biblical law, to Obergefell v. Hodges decision of June 26, 2015, if granted the opportunity! Hebrews 13:4 states: "Marriage should be honored by all, and the marriage bed kept pure, for God will judge the adulterer and all the sexually immoral." And in Genesis 9:7: "As for you, be fruitful and increase in number; multiply on the earth and increase upon it.โ In the latter instance, only a man and a woman can fulfill God's commands! As a citizen of Oklahoma, I am respectfully asking you to represent to will of the People and allow SCR8 to be properly voted on the Senate Floor during this 2026 Legislative session. The sooner the better!
SB302: State fiscal affairs; creating the Oklahoma Law Enforcement Legacy Fund; making an appropriation. Effective date. Emergency.
Last Action: Second Reading referred to Revenue and Taxation Committee then to Appropriations Committee
Date: 2025-02-04
Pending: ๐ Revenue and Taxation ๐ Not Scheduled
Author: Dave Rader
1
1
I support SB 1200 and its goal of preventing financial conflicts of interest on school and technology center boards. The bill takes an important step toward protecting public trust in education governance. To strengthen the bill without changing its intent, I respectfully suggest a few clarifications to better define what qualifies as a disqualifying interest, limit unintended exclusions of community members, and ensure the rule is applied fairly and consistently.
1) Clarify What โInterestโ Means
Example: A retired contractor who owns a small, inactive stake in a construction company that has not worked with a school district in years would not automatically be disqualified.
Why: Without clarification, the term โinterestโ could be read too broadly and exclude people with no real influence or involvement in school contracts.
2) Limit the Scope to Active or Direct Involvement
Example: A person who works for a large company that occasionally issues bonds statewide but has no role in school-related projects or decisions, would not be barred from serving.
Why: This prevents the rule from unintentionally excluding individuals who have no practical ability to influence school board decisions.
3) Provide a Clear Look-Back or Time Boundary
Example: Someone who sold their business years ago or ended involvement before filing for office would be eligible to run.
Why: Without a time boundary, past or long-ended activities could permanently disqualify otherwise qualified candidates.
Who these amendments protect: These amendments protect local voters, school districts, and community members who want ethical governance without unnecessary exclusions. They help ensure the bill targets real conflicts of interest, prevents confusion or uneven enforcement, and keeps school boards open to qualified citizens while maintaining public trust.